Count revenue as well as cost
Most plans count AI's value as cost savings, which fade as competitors adopt the same tools. Count the revenue side too: capacity turned into more selling and service, new AI products, and new ways to price.
AnswersAI transformation
In short
Measure AI ROI the way you would measure any operating change: record a baseline before the build, define success as a business outcome the company already tracks, test on real cases run repeatedly, score quality, cost and speed together, and keep measuring every month after launch. Benchmark scores and usage counts say little about return.
Before the build, capture the current figures for the workflow: hours, cycle time, cost per case, error rate, revenue captured.
Choose the number leadership already tracks, rather than model accuracy or adoption.
Build an evaluation set from the company's own cases, run each several times, and score it the way the experts would.
A cheaper model that misses the quality bar costs more in rework. Compare all three per task.
Report monthly against the baseline, and recheck when models, data or the workflow change.
Most plans count AI's value as cost savings, which fade as competitors adopt the same tools. Count the revenue side too: capacity turned into more selling and service, new AI products, and new ways to price.
Every Fig engagement starts with an audit that sets the baseline, and every system is measured monthly against it, with quality, cost and the full record of what the agents did in Command Center.
The first workflow should show a measured result within weeks of reaching production.
Adoption shows use, not value. Pair it with the business outcome the workflow is meant to move.
Yes. Rerun the evaluation set before any model change reaches production.
Dream big, build fast, and grow far with Fig